<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>LAML Discussion Forums - LAMLradio</title>
        <description>News, information, and discussion on anything related to LAMLradio, our audio podcast. (http://radio.laml.org/)</description>
        <link>http://forum.laml.org/list.php?7</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:26:23 +0300</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.7</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>http://forum.laml.org/read.php?7,442,442#msg-442</guid>
            <title>Technic Counter Attack Episode (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://forum.laml.org/read.php?7,442,442#msg-442</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ OK, I know we have Skype, and facebook, and email, so it might seem slightly silly to use the forums for this. But I thought, as the Technic episode was a group recording, I would make this here, public. I'm not sure if you are interested in recording more of these, but if you are I am committed to getting them out on a timely basis, unlike this first one. I'd love to here your thoughts on that, are you planning on recording more?<br />
<br />
Regardless of whether or not you are interested, here is some feedback on the first episode.<br />
<br />
First thing is the English. Peer Kreuger had great English and I had no problem at all understanding him. Jerner Krmelj was OK. And Tuomas, I hate to say it, but your English has to be improved if you are to keep up as a host. Not trying to be critical or anything, just calling it the way I hear it. :)<br />
<br />
Second is promotion, you/we need to find a way to promote the show if you plan on doing more episodes. The simple thing is, I can't put something like this into the feed as Technic is too different from system building. That means that listeners will have to choose to download the episode and I don't think too many of the current listeners will. So far, it has been downloaded 40 times. Not bad I guess, but the one I uploaded a few days ago already has 300+. What we need to do is bring Technic fans in from other sources.  If you are interested in doing more I have a few ideas on how we can get this out to Technic fans.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Jamit</dc:creator>
            <category>LAMLradio</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 20:27:47 +0300</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://forum.laml.org/read.php?7,436,436#msg-436</guid>
            <title>Bandwidth Watch (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://forum.laml.org/read.php?7,436,436#msg-436</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Well I've done a bit of a tune up on the podcast site. The job is not yet finished, but I believe once it is completed the results will be satisfactory. I want to expand the site from a straight podcasting blog to a website that acts, in a way, like a community portal. Of course everything will in some way be connected to the podcast, but the scope of the site will be slightly wider now.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, with this change I was forced to upload some images to the LAML server. The files sizes of all these images are low (under 100kb, average of 60kb I would guess) but they are still larger sizes than the simple text we have had in the past. Hopefully this isn't a problem, but I wanted to create this thread to make you (TheQ) aware of what has happened and in case it becomes a problem, we can discuss it here.<br />
<br />
-James]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Jamit</dc:creator>
            <category>LAMLradio</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:24:24 +0300</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://forum.laml.org/read.php?7,225,225#msg-225</guid>
            <title>Resurrection of evil... I mean podcast (no replies)</title>
            <link>http://forum.laml.org/read.php?7,225,225#msg-225</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Seems like LAMLRadio has turned from the active podcast to old ceremonic creature that moves once a month a bit.. I know that James has been busy with all kinds of things but I am fearing a bit about the future of the LAMLRadio. I don't know if there is any good way to &quot;resurrect&quot; the show (perhaps adding new few members and perhaps secondary show?) but I would like to help in any way possible.<br />
<br />
So, is there still people here who have ideas and willingness to do something fun?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>TheQ</dc:creator>
            <category>LAMLradio</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:48:13 +0200</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://forum.laml.org/read.php?7,221,221#msg-221</guid>
            <title>LAMLRadio back-catalog (1 reply)</title>
            <link>http://forum.laml.org/read.php?7,221,221#msg-221</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I was browsing internet and stumbled upon this LAMLRadio <a rel="nofollow"  href="http://odeo.com/channels/2118262-LAMLradio-LEGO-Talk-Podcast/episodes?page=11">&quot;back-catalog&quot;</a> which I found very interesting.<br />
<br />
I don't know if the first nine episodes are still somewhere online but rest of the podcasts seem to be there.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>TheQ</dc:creator>
            <category>LAMLradio</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:04:43 +0300</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://forum.laml.org/read.php?7,182,182#msg-182</guid>
            <title>Return To The Live Show? (2 replies)</title>
            <link>http://forum.laml.org/read.php?7,182,182#msg-182</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Its been a while since our last, ill fated live show. I'm debating if this is a format that the show should return to. I love the listener feedback we receive while doing the show, but I'm not sure if the effort of setting it up is worth it. What do you guys think, do you like the format of a live show?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Jamit</dc:creator>
            <category>LAMLradio</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:09:39 +0300</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
